\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,height=3cm]{share_fraction}
+ \figinput[3cm]{share_fraction}
\caption{A particle traversing 2 strips and depositing energy in
each strip. }
\label{fig:share_fraction}
secondaries.
\begin{figure}[]
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{%
- secondary_origin}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{secondary_origin}
\caption{$\dndeta$ for secondaries and primaries in the FMD. The
same plot for the SPD inner layer is included for comparison.}
\label{secondaries}
finalised plots.
\begin{figure}[]
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{results_ppdndeta}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{results_ppdndeta}
\caption{$\dndeta$ for pp for \INEL{} events at
$\sqrt{s}=\GeV{900}$, $\sqrt{s}=\TeV{2.76}$, and $\sqrt{s}=\TeV{7}$
$\cm{-10}\le v_z\le\cm{10}$, rebinned by a factor 5 \cite{hhd:2009}.
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[]
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{results_PbPbdndeta}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{results_PbPbdndeta}
\caption{$\dndeta$ for Pb+Pb for Minimum Bias events at
$\sqrt{s_{NN}}=\TeV{2.76}$ $\cm{-10}\le v_z\le\cm{10}$, rebinned by a
factor 5 in 10 centrality intervals \cite{hhd:2009}.
vertices.
\begin{figure}[hbp]
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{performance_coverage}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{performance_coverage}
\caption{Pseudorapidity coverage of the FMD as a function of vertex
with displaced vertices.}
\label{coverage}
$6 \%$ remain.
\begin{figure}[hbp]
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{performance_spdfmdvzero}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{performance_spdfmdvzero}
\caption{$\dndeta$ measured with nominal vertices with the SPD and
displaced vertices with VZERO and FMD. It is seen that there is
good agreement between the measurements.}
\centering
\begin{minipage}{0.5\linewidth}
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{performance_ratio_tocombined}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{performance_ratio_tocombined}
\end{minipage}%
\begin{minipage}{0.5\linewidth}
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{performance_ratio_tospd}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{performance_ratio_tospd}
\end{minipage}%
\caption{Left: Ratio of FMD and VZERO measurements to the combined
$\dndeta$ measured with SPD, VZERO and FMD. Right: Ratios of FMD
\begin{figure}
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{performance_dndphi_fmd1}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{performance_dndphi_fmd1}
\caption{Examples of $\dndphi$ from FMD1 (positive
pseudorapidities). The distributions are essentially flat.}
\label{dndphi_pos}
\begin{figure}
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{performance_dndphi_fmd2}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{performance_dndphi_fmd2}
\caption{Examples of $\dndphi$ from FMD2I (negative
pseudorapidities). The two low points at $\varphi \sim 5.5$ are
understood as the result of two dying chips in FMD2I. They are
\begin{figure}
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=0.8\textwidth]{performance_pervertex_negfield}
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=0.8\textwidth]{performance_pervertex_posfield}
+ \figinput[0.8\textwidth]{performance_pervertex_negfield}
+ \figinput[0.8\textwidth]{performance_pervertex_posfield}
%\end{minipage}%
\caption{Top: Analysis per vertex for negative field data. Bottom:
Analysis per vertex for positive field data. In the two plots the
of up to $\sim 5 \%$.
\begin{figure}
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=0.7\textwidth]{performance_ratio_leftright}
+ \figinput[0.7\textwidth]{performance_ratio_leftright}
\caption{Ratios of the positive and negative pseudorapidities for
the FMD (ratio is negative over positive). The grey band indicates
the combined systematic error for FMD1I and FMD2I assuming
\begin{figure}
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{results_PbPbdndeta_sat}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{results_PbPbdndeta_sat}
\caption{Request for ALICE preliminary: Combined $\dndeta$ measured
with SPD, VZERO and FMD. The VZERO and FMD measurements are made
with displaced vertices and the SPD measurement is made at the
figure \ref{combineddndeta} and data taken from \cite{Aamodt:2010cz}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{results_PbPbnpart_sat}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{results_PbPbnpart_sat}
\caption{Request for ALICE preliminary: The $dN/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$
measured with SPD, VZERO and FMD. The VZERO and FMD measurements
are made with displaced vertices and the SPD measurement is made
\begin{figure}
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{results_PbPbnpart_ratio}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{results_PbPbnpart_ratio}
\caption{Request for ALICE preliminary: Ratios of
$dN/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ at $0.5<\eta<1.5$, $1.5<\eta<2.5$,
$2.5<\eta<3.5$, $3.5<\eta<4.5$, and $4.5<\eta<5.5$ to the
\begin{figure}
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{results_PbPblongscaling_sat}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{results_PbPblongscaling_sat}
\caption{Request for ALICE preliminary: Study of Longitudinal
scaling. $\dndeta$ as a function of $y'=\eta-y_{beam}$ from Figure
\ref{combineddndeta} and the BRAHMS\cite{Bearden:2001qq} and
\begin{figure}
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{results_PbPbtotalnch_sat}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{results_PbPbtotalnch_sat}
\caption{Request for ALICE preliminary: Total number of charged
particles, $N_{ch}=\int^{y_{beam}}_{-y_{beam}}\dndeta d\eta$,
obtained from the fitted function in figure
\centering
\begin{minipage}{0.5\linewidth}
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{oldprelim_wrong}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{oldprelim_wrong}
\end{minipage}%
\begin{minipage}{0.5\linewidth}
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{oldprelim_right}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{oldprelim_right}
\end{minipage}%
\caption{Left: Comparison of new combined $\dndeta$ to the data
shown at QM 2011. Right: The same comparison with the properly run
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
- \includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\textwidth]{eloss_fits}
+ \figinput[\textwidth]{eloss_fits}
\caption{Summary of energy loss fits in each $\eta$ bin (see also
\secref{sec:sub:sub:eloss_fits}).
\newline
git://git.uio.no / u / mrichter / AliRoot.git / commitdiff
